Higgs Boson - Sixty Symbols

TrymyrT Says:

May 23, 2012 - One particle to rule them all, one particle to find them. One particle to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

NerdsFlashMinecraft Says:

May 21, 2012 - Higgs Boson: "it surrounds us, penetrates us, it binds the galaxies together", Obi Wan Kenobi.

mrnosy1 Says:

May 21, 2012 - Einstein didn't believe in QM which sometimes cannot be explained simply, which is one of the reasons as to why he objected to it

arunkumarvikram Says:

May 18, 2012 - Search "Why question Richard Feynman" in youtube and watch the first video U will understand why somethings can't be explained in simple terms :)

419dman Says:

May 17, 2012 - Albert wasn't saying that everyone will truly understand your simple explination, only that if you have a deep understanding you can explain it simply: e=mc² Now that is a wonderfully simple explanation that takes quite a bit of doing to fully understand is it not.

Witnaaay Says:

May 15, 2012 - You explain it simply, but concepts build on themselves and soon enough it takes too long to explain that you become an expert anyway... university.

blobo18 Says:

May 13, 2012 - wow..almost everything about that statement was wrong

blobo18 Says:

May 13, 2012 - Well it is the Higgs Boson...no-one really understands it yet

TheReasonWhyGuy Says:

May 7, 2012 - Exactly

TheReasonWhyGuy Says:

May 7, 2012 - Yes... maybe...

Kevin Kevinson Says:

May 7, 2012 - In regards to the LHC, I have heard 200 million collisions per second, 600 million collisions per second, 800 million collisions per second, and 1 billion collisions per second......which is it? Or is it a varying amount of collisions per second that is different from one second to the next?

WarbananaOfDA Says:

May 7, 2012 - Can't explain it. MEXICAN HAT TIME!!!

MrTyAaron Says:

May 3, 2012 - So, my question then would be. If Higgs Boson particles give all other particles mass, why do Higgs Bosons have mass? (What would be giving the Higgs mass?)

Ther04r1 Says:

May 3, 2012 - Your statement is both agreeing with itself and not. Read it over, 2-3-4 times... You'll see.

MrIamahugefaggot Says:

May 3, 2012 - What are you even talking about? Create a star? No. Use nuclear fusion to harvest energy? Yeah. Google ITER and inform yourself. ;_;

SciPhi161 Says:

Apr 28, 2012 - I think he's brilliant and if you saw the other videos with him in them you would think the same. At least everyone else does.

abduldavinci Says:

Apr 26, 2012 - Scientists expects to create a star on earth using fusion. Do they know that the outcome wouldnt be a star but a weird flameball due to gravity?

SeedsofJoy Says:

Apr 26, 2012 - The old guy with the glasses is hopeless. Never explains anything, just whinges.

kajakpaddler92 Says:

Apr 24, 2012 - I'll answer einstein simply saying that: "just because you cannot explain something using ordinary language, doesn't mean that you cannot explain it in terms of mathematics"

opliik Says:

Apr 22, 2012 - Indeed, we don't fully comprehend these physics yet. That's why we build big expensive particle accelerators. To study them and learn.

don4life97 Says:

Apr 16, 2012 - @0:00 scared the fucking crap out of me

PeterCCamilleri Says:

Apr 15, 2012 - I have to wonder... given the conditions that the LHC needs to create, have any Higgs Bosons existed in "nature" since the big bang? I mean the temperatures achieved by LHC make a supernova look like a cryogenics lab.

SillyEddyPhotography Says:

Apr 13, 2012 - "Can I bring my hat into this?" Haha... Every theoretical physicist gets to wear a sombrero to their graduation!

93Cobalt Says:

Apr 13, 2012 - People aren't grammar Nazi's in Britain, especially the North.

ShiroKage009 Says:

Apr 11, 2012 - Well, with due respect to Einstein, he's a human being. There are people to which you can't simplify complex ideas, but you need to get them up to the level where the ideas are at their simplest while still retaining their accuracy. The public is not literal enough in the disciplines of science, on average, to not need that process.